|
发表于 2010-7-23 21:52:14
|
显示全部楼层
叹号,请去掉,很容易让人误以为 lz 是小朋友。
GPL 律师杰作,不要假定自己真能读懂。
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org 有针对大众指引:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNFCan I use GPL-covered editors such as GNU Emacs to develop non-free programs? Can I use GPL-covered tools such as GCC to compile them?
Yes, because the copyright on the editors and tools does not cover the code you write. Using them does not place any restrictions, legally, on the license you use for your code.
Some programs copy parts of themselves into the output for technical reasons—for example, Bison copies a standard parser program into its output file. In such cases, the copied text in the output is covered by the same license that covers it in the source code. Meanwhile, the part of the output which is derived from the program's input inherits the copyright status of the input.
As it happens, Bison can also be used to develop non-free programs. This is because we decided to explicitly permit the use of the Bison standard parser program in Bison output files without restriction. We made the decision because there were other tools comparable to Bison which already permitted use for non-free programs.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LibGCCExceptionWhere can I learn more about the GCC Runtime Library Exception?
The GCC Runtime Library Exception covers libgcc, libstdc++, libfortran, libgomp, libdecnumber, and other libraries distributed with GCC. The exception is meant to allow people to distribute programs compiled with GCC under terms of their choice, even when parts of these libraries are included in the executable as part of the compilation process. To learn more, please read our FAQ about the GCC Runtime Library Exception.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception-faq.html 请通读全文 |
|